pop
- advice goddess
- a.j. jacobs
- arts & letters daily
- banterist
- eric berlin
- best week ever
- blowing smoke
- boing boing
- buck hill
- burro hall
- cinecultist
- cinematical
- city rag
- corporate casual
- the corsair
- coudal
- the cure for bedbugs
- cutting to the chase
- defamer
- the dirk
- drew's blog-o-rama
- encyclopedia hanasiana
- fark
- fimoculous
- gawker
- glass shallot
- golden fiddle
- go fug yourself
- grow a brain
- happy scrappy
- heaneyland
- lindsayism
- low culture
- meme first
- metafilter
- the morning news
- the movie blog
- muss my hair
- new yorkish
- maud newton
- obscure store
- old hag
- opinionade
- panopticist
- pieces of flair
- precog
- pullquote
- radar
- screenhead
- slumbering lungfish
- stereogum
- throwing things
- tmftml
- toner mishap
- tuned in
- tv squad
- whatevs
- whedonesque
politics
- 100 monkeys
- roger ailes
- altercation
- americablog
- buzzmachine
- comment is free
- marc cooper
- crooked timber
- daily kos
- brad delong
- direland
- eschaton
- fairshot
- functional ambivalent
- gone to croatan
- hit and run
- huffington post
- jesus' general
- kaus files
- ezra klein
- majikthise
- brendan nyhan
- the opinionator
- pandagon
- the plank
- political animal
- the poor man
- andrew sullivan
- talking points memo
- tapped
- james taranto
- this modern world
- tpm cafe
- unqualified offerings
- james wolcott
- wonkette
- matthew yglesias
sex
media
religion
new york
personal
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2
Movable Type 3.2
Comments
Heterosexuality is bizarre.
Posted by: J.D. | November 26, 2008 4:24 PM
In the past everything was sexualised, even healthfoods:
http://www.antiquelabelcompany.com/store/cart.php?m=product_detail&p=78
Posted by: TG Gibbon | November 26, 2008 5:51 PM
@TG--Oh my gosh--I own that! Paid a lot less for it, too.
I'm pretty sure it's a fake--not just a reproduction. I strongly suspect there never was such a company, product or label.
Posted by: Trout Almondine | November 26, 2008 6:35 PM
Posted by: Tali | November 27, 2008 3:27 AM
Trout -- I wish! A hoax collectibles industry would be great. But http://articles.latimes.com/1998/dec/05/home/hm-50670
Posted by: TG Gibbon | November 27, 2008 5:48 AM
The one on the left -- is she queefing?
Posted by: J.D. | November 27, 2008 2:38 PM
By "You saw this coming," are you making a declaration about the state I was in upon seeing it?
If so, spot on!
(The Elvgrenesque one, that is - not that hideously rendered tranny in the second one. Yiii.)
Posted by: Vance | November 28, 2008 11:42 PM
Actually, I was expecting the Clique Girlz.
Posted by: JohnnyB | November 29, 2008 9:06 AM