It is indeed anti-caption-esque, but that guy Hilgerdt's captions are always very "anti." That's his shtick, I think. Perhaps the NYer is trying to use him to neutralize your contest by striking at its very premise.
Bah. It's more of an anti-New-Yorker-cartoon, not an anti-caption. The image prominently features a keg and a million used plastic cups. It is a literal description of the scene with a New Yorkeresque middlebrow psychological lament.
I'm sure that everyone can pitch in with a better anti-caption.
I'll start: "No, it probably wasn't a good way to celebrate the pregnancy."
Comments
It is indeed anti-caption-esque, but that guy Hilgerdt's captions are always very "anti." That's his shtick, I think. Perhaps the NYer is trying to use him to neutralize your contest by striking at its very premise.
Posted by: Max | January 8, 2008 02:13 PM
Bah. It's more of an anti-New-Yorker-cartoon, not an anti-caption. The image prominently features a keg and a million used plastic cups. It is a literal description of the scene with a New Yorkeresque middlebrow psychological lament.
I'm sure that everyone can pitch in with a better anti-caption.
I'll start: "No, it probably wasn't a good way to celebrate the pregnancy."
Posted by: Charles | January 8, 2008 03:28 PM
Wait, what? That's not the right cartoon! Hang on...
Posted by: radosh | January 8, 2008 03:35 PM
Try again. As Max notes, it's supposed to be the Erik Hilgerdt. Not sure why the link changed.
Posted by: radosh | January 8, 2008 03:37 PM
Now that's an anti-caption.
And for the surely curious readers, I was captioning this.
Posted by: Charles | January 8, 2008 03:46 PM
Wait, what? That's not the right cartoon!
I know, I know, you were concentrating on not misspelling "Kissinger"...
Posted by: Vance | January 8, 2008 05:37 PM
Do New Yorker cartoonists and editors read this site? Just curious.
Posted by: John Tabin | January 9, 2008 07:43 PM
They're aware of it. I don't know how many read it.
Posted by: radosh | January 9, 2008 07:56 PM