Can you have a contractual obligation without a contract?
New York magazine's feature story on Kurt Eichenwald is just one big bundle of sad. And somehow, I doubt it's the last word on this subject. What do you say, people, can I stop blogging about this already?
Comments
>> For this, he blames a campaign by the convicts he’s exposed, other child molesters he doesn’t even know, random anonymous bloggers,
Dammit, Daniel Radosh, why do you hide behind the cloak of anonymity?
Posted by: Jim/The Velvet Blog | October 29, 2007 11:15 AM
I'm fascinated by:
1. the fact that he named his epilepsy "Michael."
2. The way they just blew past that in the article like it was normal.
Posted by: lindsay | October 29, 2007 9:08 PM
Radosh, you can stop blogging about Eichenwald if you like, but the forces of the universe will forbid you from using the word "huckapoo" if you do.
That said, I was bowled over by the revelation that Eichenwald and Berry watched illegal porn together. It was hidden towards the end of France's article, but it's there.
Now, I wonder whether they ...err...uhhh...helped each other out while they watched it.
Posted by: James | October 30, 2007 4:37 PM
Please don't stop blooging on this story; I find it endlessly fascinating.
That Eichenweld may have been helping fund the porn site himself was bizarre enough; that he now seems to blame it on "Michael," his epilepsy, is the kind of thing one would be hard pressed to make up.
Posted by: Bettencourt | October 31, 2007 6:45 PM