Yes, but what percentage obscene are the hours here?
Faithful anti-captioner David analyzes the first 100 cartoons used in the New Yorker contest.
pop
- advice goddess
- a.j. jacobs
- arts & letters daily
- banterist
- eric berlin
- best week ever
- blowing smoke
- boing boing
- buck hill
- burro hall
- cinecultist
- cinematical
- city rag
- corporate casual
- the corsair
- coudal
- the cure for bedbugs
- cutting to the chase
- defamer
- the dirk
- drew's blog-o-rama
- encyclopedia hanasiana
- fark
- fimoculous
- gawker
- glass shallot
- golden fiddle
- go fug yourself
- grow a brain
- happy scrappy
- heaneyland
- lindsayism
- low culture
- meme first
- metafilter
- the morning news
- the movie blog
- muss my hair
- new yorkish
- maud newton
- obscure store
- old hag
- opinionade
- panopticist
- pieces of flair
- precog
- pullquote
- radar
- screenhead
- slumbering lungfish
- stereogum
- throwing things
- tmftml
- toner mishap
- tuned in
- tv squad
- whatevs
- whedonesque
politics
- 100 monkeys
- roger ailes
- altercation
- americablog
- buzzmachine
- comment is free
- marc cooper
- crooked timber
- daily kos
- brad delong
- direland
- eschaton
- fairshot
- functional ambivalent
- gone to croatan
- hit and run
- huffington post
- jesus' general
- kaus files
- ezra klein
- majikthise
- brendan nyhan
- the opinionator
- pandagon
- the plank
- political animal
- the poor man
- andrew sullivan
- talking points memo
- tapped
- james taranto
- this modern world
- tpm cafe
- unqualified offerings
- james wolcott
- wonkette
- matthew yglesias
sex
media
religion
new york
personal
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2
Movable Type 3.2
Comments
Love the headline.
Posted by: David F | June 28, 2007 1:12 PM
haha
Posted by: Harry | July 3, 2007 2:13 PM