need more stuff?

February 4, 2004

It looks like Jack Shafer

Daniel Radosh

It looks like Jack Shafer wants to tag in again. And the New York Observer turns several column inches over to The Times for another rebuttal. Marzorati's new defense: Most of the evidence couldn't be published because Landesman got it on deep background, but that's OK because "for most of our readers, they understand it's The Times. The Times doesn't just throw things out at the readers without going through an enormously painstaking vetting process." Well, that's a load off my mind.

Update: Yes, of course there's an update, silly.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.2